Mind the gap

25 October 2018

Mind the gap. Public talks on Science and Art (X)
15.00h | FCUL | Room 6.2.50 | Free entry

11 October 2018

Mind the gap. Public talks on Science and Art (IX)
15.00h | FCUL | Room 6.2.50 | Free entry

18 October 2016

Mind the gap. Public talks on Science and Art (VIII)
14.30h | FCUL | Room 8.2.10 | Free entry



30 September 2016

Mind the gap. Public talks on Science and Art (VII)
15.00h | FCUL | Room 8.2.12 | Free entry
18.00h| Fábrica Braço de Prata | Free entry



Organization: SAP Lab, RG Philosophy of Nature Sciences (CFCUL) with the collaboration of Dr. Teresa Madeira Amorim (Dept. Physics, FCUL)
Poetry Reading and Music Program

7 July 2016

Mind the gap. Public talks on Science and Art (VI)
11.00h | FCUL | Room 8.2.03 | Free entry


A investigação artística entre nóesis e poiésis
Propõe-se o tetraedro de Leonardo da Vinci, um dos cinco sólidos regulares platónicos, como figura simbólica do equilibro entre o Cognoscere e o Scire. As históricas relações entre as artes liberais e as mecânicas, diferenciando Nóesis de Poiésis, conduziram até à redução do desejado diálogo tetralógico universitário a um simplificado esquema bipolar. Assim as quatro mind the gap 7 de julho -01-01grandes secções polarizaram-se em dois grupos, Tecnológicas/Sociojurídicas separadas de Humanidades/ Experimentais.
Desde esta “Crise das ciências europeias” anunciada por Husserl, acentuada agora geopoliticamente, parece
urgente recordar a capacidade estrutural da Arte não só como projecto investigador, senão como impulsionador cognitivo unificador de saberes, próprio do pensamento complexo, ainda que, por vezes, o exercício da criação tenha sido considerado como simples habilidade caprichosa e circense carente de verificabilidade.

20 May 2016

Mind the gap. Public talks on Science and Art (V)
10.30h – 12.00h | FCUL | Room 3.2.13 | Free entry


13 May 2016

Mind the gap. Public talks on Science and Art (IV)
10.30h – 12.00h | FCUL | Room 3.2.13 | Free entry

Ciência e ficção

04 May 2016

Mind the gap. Public talks on Science and Art (III)
10.30h – 13.30h | FCUL | Room 8.2.13 | Free entry


28 April 2016

Mind the gap. Public talks on Science and Art (II)
15h – 19h | FCUL | Room 6.2.52


Ingeborg Reichle
Institute for Fine Arts and Media Art, University of Applied Arts Vienna

Synthetic Biology in Art & Design: Reframing Life in Current Artistic Practices and Design Approaches
In the last three decades the incorporation of biological material, like cells, bacteria, tissue cultures, and scientific technologies, into the arts went hand in hand with debates about the aesthetic value and ethical and ontological consequences of introducing cutting edge science into the arts. With the emergence of BioArt, biotechnology became part of the art world, raising questions about the aesthetic and ethical status of manipulating the genetic make-up of living organisms. This encounter with living materials has opened up new avenues of artistic expression, and by bringing biotechnology and genetic engineering closer to the public sphere art has provoked wider reflection about the ethics of turning biology into technology.

Lately artists and designers turned their attention to the emerging field of synthetic biology, a new approach to engineering biology that will soon turn into an important agent of the transformation of our economy into a bioscience-based economy. While passing through the gates of academic institutions to go ‘hands-on’ in a laboratory was a challenging encounter in the early days of BioArt, the field of synthetic biology virtually seems to welcome artists and designers. Only five years after the first iGEM competition did take place at MIT in 2004 a new category was added: art and design. By applying engineering principles to life – to build in the long run new complex living systems, scientists and engineers are making biology also a new material for design. This shift makes it necessary for artists and designers to get acquainted with the new epistemologies of synthetic biology and the logic of the technoscientific regime, which governs the re-framing of life within this new setting: a setting that is ruled by patents, the flow of global capital and government based strategic plans for a new bioscience-based economy: In February 2016 the UK-Minister for Life Sciences announced the UK Synthetic Biology Strategic Plan 2016 with a most promising title Biodesign for the Bioeconomy.
In my paper I will examine a number of case studies of art’s encounter with synthetic biology to develop a critical understanding of the role of art in the twenty-first century.

Suggested readings:
Ingeborg Reichle, Synthetische Biologie und biologisches Design in Kunst und Wissenschaft. In: Sonja Kießling, Heike Catherina Mertens (eds.), Evolution in Menschenhand? Synthetische Biologie aus Labor und Atelier, Freiburg i. Br. 2016, Herder, pp. 77-92
Kristin Hagen, Margret Engelhard, Georg Toepfer (eds.), Ambivalences of Creating Life. Societal and Philosophical Dimensions of Synthetic Biology. Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, Vol. 45, Cham, Springer International Publishing, 2016

Further readings:
Jenny Boulboullé, ‘In Touch With Life. Investigating Epistemic Practices in the Life Sciences from a hands-on Perspective’ in Bio Art, Descartes as a hands-on Practitioner, Molecular Genetics Laboratories; Diss, University of Maastricht, 2012
Robert H. Carlson, Biology Is Technology. The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2011
Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg et al. (eds), Synthetic Aesthetics. Investigating Synthetic Biology’s Designs on Nature, Cambridge, MA, London, MIT Press 2014
William Myers, Bio Design. Nature, Science, Creativity. Foreword by Paola Antonelli, The Museum of Modern Art, New York, London, Thames & Hudson, 2012

María Antonia González Valerio
Professor, PhD, Faculty of Philosophy and Literature, National Autonomous University of Mexico

Repositioning Biotech Arts in Mexico.
The project of Art&Science at the National University of Mexico
What are the aims of a research group and an art collective that reunite scholars, artists, scientists, and students inside a huge university that shelters almost any research field that is being studied in the country?

What are the possibilities of working in the intertwining of art, science, technology and humanities in Mexico City and which ones could be the topics that should be addressed from a local point of view? And why local?
In this talk I will address these questions and present the recent projects that we have developed in Mexico City in the intertwining of arts, science and philosophy that deal with biotechnology, transgenic corn, bioartifactuality and animality.

María Antonia González Valerio is a philosopher working in the fields of aesthetics and ontology, with a focus on biotechnologies and the arts. She is full professor at the Faculty of Philosophy, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). She is the author of three books: Cabe los límites. Escritos sobre filosofía natural desde la ontología estética (México, Herder, 2016), Un tratado de ficción. Ontología de la mimesis (Herder, 2010) and El arte develado (Herder, 2005). She is editor of five books, the most recent: Pròs Bíon: Reflexiones naturales desde el arte, la ciencia y la filosofía (UNAM, 2014). She is the head of the interdisciplinary research group Art+Science based at the UNAM and the coordinator of the arts collective BIOS Ex machinA (workshop for the fabrication of the human and the nonhuman).
She has also worked as curator in Mexico.


4 Dec 2015

Mind the gap. Public talks (I): What does it mean when we talk about “Science and Art”?
14h – 17h | FCUL | Room 6.1.27
The discussion had the special participation of: Ingeborg Reichle, Olga Pombo, Cristina Tavares and Dalila Honorato.